Ought To vs. Might
'Ought to' and 'might' are used to talk about possibilities and may confuse learners. In this lesson, we will learn when to use them.
What Is Their Main Difference?
The main difference between 'ought to' and 'might' is that 'ought to' is a semi-modal verb while 'might' is a modal verb.
Ought to
As mentioned earlier, 'ought to' is a semi-modal verb. Semi-modals sometimes act like modal verbs and sometimes act like main verbs. 'Ought to' expresses obligations and assumptions. For instance:
You
He
Might
'Might' is a modal verb. Modal verbs give additional information about the main verb. 'Might' expresses possibilities and advice. It is the past tense of modal verb 'may.' Have a look:
I thought she
The hurricane
Similarity
Talking about Possibilities
We use 'ought to' and 'might' to talk about what we think is happening.
- 'Ought to' talks about logical possibilities. These deductions are based on logical assumptions.
He
The sky is so grey; it
- 'Might' expresses a slight possibility. The chance of accuracy is much lower than 'ought to.'
He
The sky is so grey; it
Differences
Talking about Obligations
We use 'ought to' to talk about obligations that can be motivated by society, someone, or oneself. For instance:
You
She
Giving Advice
We often use 'might' to politely give advice or a fair warning. In this case, we often pair 'might' with 'want' as the main verb. For example:
You
You