(of an argument) directed against a person and not their point of view

ad hominem (議論の) 人に対して向けられ、その人の見解に対してではない
a part of a larger system or process, with its specific qualities determined by the preceding adjectives
a set of facts or information that can be used to win an argument against someone or to criticize them

弾薬, 議論の材料
a situation in which a theory or argument cannot be true because two or more parts of it are contradictory

アポリア, 理論的な行き詰まり
(of an ideology or opinion) not certain and could be backed up by facts and reasons

議論の余地がある, 疑わしい
used to convey that a statement can be supported with reasons or evidence

おそらく、間違いなく
to provide reasons when saying something is the case, particularly to persuade others that one is right

主張する, 議論する
a reason or sets of reasons presented to show the correctness or falsehood of an action or idea

議論, 論拠
(of a person) ready to argue and often arguing

議論好きな, 論争的な
something that can be used as a basis for criticism or punishment of someone
used to introduce a second fact that must be taken into account
to keep repeating or stressing an idea, argument, etc., especially when it is unnecessary
to persuade a group of people to accept one's arguments by winning their support or sympathy

説得する, 支持を得る
a series of facts supporting a theory or an argument

事件, 議論
the practice of unsound reasoning and falsely arguing questions in a clever way

詭弁, こじつけ
(of an argument or a theory) involving an idea or statement to prove something that is then used to prove the statement itself

循環的な
the fact of a theory or an argument continuously returning to the starting point, due to having a conclusion that has been assumed as a premise

循環性, 循環論法
to say that something is the case without providing proof for it

主張する, 断言する
a weakness in someone's character or argument that can be used against them
a statement about the truth of something without offering any verification or proof

主張, 申し立て
to reluctantly admit that something is true after denying it first

認める, しぶしぶ認める
to prove something or someone wrong or false through evidence or argumentation

論破する, 反駁する
in a way that is always the same

一貫して、着実に
to argue the truth of something

主張する, 弁護する
a thing that is the direct or natural result of another

当然の結果, 帰結
an opposing argument or viewpoint that challenges an idea or theory

反論, 対立する見解
an example or a fact that refutes or contradicts a theory, hypothesis, or a proposition

反例, 逆の例
able to be believed or relied on

信頼できる, 信用できる
the case that is a combination of collected facts and adopted methods presented by or on the behalf of the accused party so that they would be granted a judgment of acquittal

防御, 弁護
to support someone or try to justify an action, plan, etc.

守る, 支持する
having a justifiable basis that can be supported or explained

防御可能な, 正当化できる
a method of uncovering the truth about something by comparing contradicting ideas and considering different theories

弁証法, 弁証法的方法
referring to the method of argumentation or discourse that involves the exchange of opposing ideas or viewpoints in order to reach a deeper understanding or resolution

弁証法的な, 弁証法に関する
to make something clear by emphasizing, or providing examples, proof, etc.
anything that proves the truth or possibility of something, such as facts, objects, or signs

証拠, 根拠
to thoroughly defeat someone in an argument, a contest, etc.

打ち負かす, 完敗させる
to explain or describe something in detail, often in a formal or structured manner

詳細に説明する, 展開する
used to introduce the first point in the series, especially in arguments or when stating one's opinions, reasons, etc.
used to state the first and foremost of a series of facts, opinions, questions etc., especially in an argument
used to convey that what one is saying about something is also true for another related thing

ちなみに, それに
used to introduce additional information

さらに, その上
意見と議論 |
---|
